The Holy Land, Part 4: Did Israel Get Replaced?

Read the previous parts of this series here:
The Holy Land, Part 1: What Does it Really Mean to be Holy?
The Holy Land, Part 2: Who or What is Israel?
The Holy Land, Part 3: The Spiritual Significance of the Land

The Return to the Promised Land

The Old Testament is filled with stories of Israel’s repeated unfaithfulness. Time and time again, the people of Israel abandoned his ways in favor of idolatry and the adoption of the corrupt practices of the surrounding nations. Eventually, their continual rebellion led to judgment: exile from the very land God had promised to them.

First, the ten northern tribes of Israel were conquered by the Assyrian Empire and were scattered. Later, the southern kingdom – Judah and Benjamin – fell to Babylon, and its people were also taken into captivity.

But exile was not the end of the story – neither for Israel nor for the promised land. During the Babylonian captivity, God sent prophets to speak messages of hope. On multiple occasions, they foretold a return to the land. But the return to the land would be different. God had plans to do something new.

For example, consider the prophecy found in Ezekiel 47:22-23. God commanded that when the people returned to the land, the sojourners living among them would receive an inheritance in the land alongside the Israelites. Sojourners were non-Israelites, or foreigners, living in the land of Israel.

You shall allot [the land] as an inheritance for yourselves and for the sojourners who reside among you and have children among you. They shall be to you as native-born children of Israel. With you they shall be allotted an inheritance among the tribes of Israel. In whatever tribe the sojourner resides, there you shall assign him his inheritance, declares the LORD GOD.

Think for a moment about how significant this is. God Himself declared that when the exile was over, foreigners would receive an inheritance alongside the Israelites. Once again we see that genetics and genealogy have nothing to do with God’s definition of Israel. The prophet Ezekiel anticipated that God was preparing the way for something far greater than a merely ethnic nation. He was showing that being Israel was never primarily about bloodline – it was about being part of God’s chosen family, however God ultimately decided to define that family.

The Vine Metaphor

Throughout the Old Testament, Israel is described as a vine planted in God’s land. The imagery is used repeatedly, and provides us with a vivid and powerful way to picture God’s purposes for His people.

For example, the psalmist in exile cried out, remembering how God had brought a vine out of Egypt and planted it in the land.

You brought a vine out of Egypt;
You drove out the nations and planted it.
You cleared the ground for it;
It took deep root and filled the land.

Psalm 80:8-9

Similarly, Hosea mourned, describing Israel as a vine offering its own fruit on altars to other gods.

Israel is a luxuriant vine
that yields its fruit.
The more his fruit increased,
the more altars he built;
as his country improved,
he improved his pillars.

Hosea 10:1

Isaiah used the metaphor to condemn Israel’s injustice, idolatry, and violence.

For the vineyard of the LORD of hosts
is the house of Israel,
and the men of Judah
are his pleasant planting
and he looked for justice,
but behold, bloodshed;
for righteousness,
but behold, an outcry!

Isaiah 5:7

Together with numerous other similar passages (Isaiah 27:2-6; Ezekiel 15:1-8; 17:1-10; 19:10-14; Jeremiah 2:21; 5:10; 12:11) these images all paint a vivid picture. The land is the vineyard, and the people of Israel are the vines. God planted Israel in His land, but the vine went wild. The vineyard was filled with bad fruit.

Jesus, building on this deeply rooted Old Testament imagery, used the vineyard metaphor to explain His own mission and identity.

I am the true vine, and my Father is the vinedresser. Every branch in me that does not bear fruit he takes away, and every branch that does not bear fruit he prunes, that it may bear more fruit. Already you are clean because of the word that I have spoken to you. Abide in me, and I in you. As the branch cannot bear fruit by itself, unless it abides in the vine, neither can you, unless you abide in me. I am the vine; you are the branches. Whoever abides in me and I in him, he it is that bears much fruit, for apart from me you can do nothing. If anyone does not abide in me he is thrown away like a branch and withers; and the branches are gathered, thrown into the fire, and burned.

John 15:1-6

With this statement, Jesus reveals the true significance of the vineyard metaphor. He wasn’t redefining it – He was fulfilling it. God’s vineyard, that is, God’s “Holy Land” now has only one true vine: Jesus, the true and faithful Israel. And all who wish to be a part of God’s vineyard must now be branches in Him. Anyone not connected to Him is like a dead branch, destined for the fire. Jesus is now the only way to be connected to God’s people.

Paul and the Definition of Israel

Paul builds on this idea in Romans 11:19-21 explaining that:

  • Some natural branches (unbelieving Jews) were broken off
  • Wild branches (believing Gentiles) were grafted in.
  • The root (God’s covenant and promises) remains

According to Paul, the key question that identifies whether one is in God’s vine is not ancestry, but faith. In Galatians 3, Paul takes us even deeper. Abraham, the father of Israel, was considered righteous because of his faith. That means that the true children of Abraham are those who have faith in Christ. Paul writes:

Know then that it is those of faith who are the sons of Abraham. And the Scriptures, foreseeing that God would justify the Gentiles by faith, preached the gospel beforehand to Abraham, saying “In you shall all the nations be blessed.

Galatians 3:7-8

And then he goes further:

Christ redeemed us…so that in Christ Jesus the blessing of Abraham might come to the Gentiles, so that we might receive the promised Spirit through faith.

Galatians 3:13-14

The promise to Abraham was never meant to end with ethnic Israel. It was always meant to extend to all nations through Abraham’s true offspring – Jesus Christ (Galatians 3:16). As Paul affirms, “All the promises of God find their Yes in him” (2 Corinthians 1:20). In Christ, the good news declared to the fathers is fulfilled (Acts 13:32-33).

In Ephesians 2, Paul explains that in Christ, Jews and Gentiles are brought together to share a common citizenship in God’s kingdom (Ephesians 2:11-13, 19). Through the cross, Jesus has “created one new man in place of the two,” having destroyed the dividing wall of hostility between them (Ephesians 2:14-15).

Does This Mean God “Replaced” Israel with the Church?

Some modern evangelicals recoil at this idea, dismissing it as “Replacement Theology,” the notion that the church has replaced Israel as God’s true people. But a careful reading of Scripture shows that Israel was never replaced – it was fulfilled.

God didn’t scrap one plan for another. Rather, His plan has always been for a people defined by faith, not flesh. Israel hasn’t been replaced; Israel has been expanded. Jesus, the Jewish Messiah, has fulfilled the promises made to Abraham and has thrown open the gates of Israel to include all nations. In Him, the people of God are not defined by ethnicity or geography, but by faith in Christ. Far from replacing Israel, the church is the ultimate fulfillment of all that Israel was always meant to become.

Shortly after His death, resurrection, and ascension, Peter writes to Christians using language that was first spoken to Israel:

But you are a chosen race, a royal priesthood, a holy nation, a people for his own possession, that you may proclaim the excellencies of him who called you out of darkness into his marvelous light.

1 Peter 2:9

Why can Peter say this? Because Christ makes all the difference. Jesus is the true Israel. And all who are in Him – Jew or Gentile – are part of God’s true Israel.

Paul echoes this in Galatians 6:16, referring to the church as “the Israel of God.” How much clearer could he be?

All the promises – including the promise of land – are granted to those who belong to Christ.

What Became of the Holy Land?

The land that was promised to Israel was once at the heart of God’s activity – a land that belonged to God, a land Israel was given, exiled from, and promised restoration to. For generations, it played a central role in God’s redemptive plan for the world. But even as Israel dwelled in the land, the prophets spoke of something greater. Not only would Israel expand to include foreigners, but the day was coming when God’s glory would fill all the earth as the waters cover the sea (Habakkuk 2:14). And then came Christ – not to abolish God’s promises, but to fulfill them.

So we’re left asking: what became of sacred space? What happened to the land God once called His own? Did the Holy Land lose it’s holiness? Or did something far more radical take place?

That’s the question we turn to in the final part of this series.

The Holy Land, Part 3: The Spiritual Significance of the Land

Now that we’ve established a clearer biblical understanding of holiness – that to be holy means being set apart by God’s presence and for God’s purposes – and clarified that Israel is not merely an ethnic group but a covenant people set apart by faith, let’s now turn our attention to the land God promised to Israel. What made that particular plot of land – the land of Canaan – holy in the first place?

A Land Promised by God

The idea of a “promised land” is rooted in God’s covenant with Abraham. In Genesis 12:7, God says, “To your offspring I will give this land,” referring to the land then occupied by the Canaanites.

Later, in Genesis 13:15-16, God broadens the scope of this promise:

For all the land that you see I will give to you and your offspring forever. I will make your offspring as the dust of the earth, so that if one can count the dust of the earth, your offspring also can be counted.

Already, there’s a hint that Abraham’s descendants would extend beyond his physical lineage – anticipating the broader definition of Israel as a people who share Abraham’s faith (cf. Romans 4:16-17). While God’s promise to Abraham centered geographically on the land of Canaan (Genesis 12:1-7; 15:18-21), the full scope of the promise would ultimately extend to a people as numerous as the dust of the earth itself.

God’s Land, God’s Sanctuary

As the Israelites prepared to enter the land, God spoke through Moses in Exodus 15:17:

You will bring them in and plant them on your own mountain,
the place, O LORD, which you have made for your abode,
the sanctuary, O Lord, which your hands have established.

Here, the land God was giving to Israel is described as God’s own dwelling place – His sanctuary. Leviticus 25:23 reinforces this point clearly:

The land shall not be sold in perpetuity, for the land is mine. For you are strangers and sojourners with me.

This is key: what made the land holy was not that it belonged to Israel, but that it belonged to God. Israel’s role was that of a guest. They were sojourners, even in the promised land. The land was holy – not because of who lived there, but because of the One who claimed it for His purposes.

Spiritual Geography

This concept of a geographical plot of land belonging to God himself can be traced back to Moses’s song in Deuteronomy 32, which we looked at briefly in the previous part of this study.

When the Most High gave to the nations their inheritance,
when he divided mankind,
he fixed the borders of the peoples
according to the number of the sons of God.
But the LORD’s portion is his people,
Jacob his allotted heritage.

Deuteronomy 32:8-9

Here we see that God assigned each nation its own allotted land, and with it, its own spiritual association. That is, the land was allotted according to the number of the “sons of God,” a phrase used in the Old Testament to refer to lesser spiritual beings (Job 1:6; 38:7; cf. Psalm 29:1; 89:6).

This divine allotment is the Bible’s explanation for why the surrounding nations came to serve other “gods” – it was part of God’s sovereign division of the land. From that vantage point, each geographical location had its own spiritual identity. Land is either holy, meaning the territory has been claimed by the one true God, where His presence dwelt and His covenant people loved, or the land was unholy, meaning the region was under the dominion of other spiritual powers.

This isn’t a denial of God’s omnipresence, but it underscores that geography itself has spiritual significance. The promised land was set apart by God’s claim on it. To live in the promised land was to dwell in the domain of the LORD; to leave it was to cross into the dominion of another spiritual power. (For a deeper dive, read “The Principalities and Powers” here.)

The Significance of Spiritual Geography

Clearly, David understood this. Have you ever noticed his lament when he fled from Saul into a foreign territory?

They have driven me out this day that I should have no share in the heritage of the LORD, saying, “Go serve other gods.”

1 Samuel 26:19

David wasn’t switching religions. He knew God was present everywhere (cf. Psalm 139:7-12). But he also knew that leaving God’s land meant stepping into regions associated with the domain of other “gods.” David understood that there was something special about the promised land. It was the place where the LORD had chosen to dwell. Meanwhile the land where he was driven was under the influence of other rebellious spiritual powers.

A similar awareness appears in the story of Naaman, the Syrian military commander healed of leprosy. After his healing, he offered a gift to Elisha. When Elisha refused payment, Naaman made what may at first sound like a very strange request:

Then Naaman said, “If not, please let there be given to your servant two mule loads of earth, for from now on your servant will not offer burnt offering or sacrifice to any god but the LORD.”

2 Kings 5:17

Two loads of earth? Dirt? Why would Naaman want to carry loads of dirt?

It wasn’t because Israel’s physical dirt was somehow superior to dirt in the surrounding region. It was because Naaman recognized the holiness of the land. He wanted to take a part of that sacred ground back with him, because he recognized that the land of Israel had spiritual significance. It was the land that belonged to the true God as opposed to all the other gods who were served among the nations.

The Conditional Nature of the Land Promise

Although God did give the land of Canaan to Israel, it was never theirs unconditionally. We read in Joshua 21:43 that God gave Israel the land, just as he had promised:

Thus the LORD gave to Israel all the land that he swore to give to their fathers. And they took possession of it and settled there.

But the land remained God’s possession. Israel’s right to dwell there was based solely on their faithfulness to the LORD. In Exodus 19:5-6, God makes this crystal clear:

Now therefore, if you will indeed obey my voice and keep my covenant, you shall be my treasured possession among all peoples, for all the earth is mine; and you shall be to me a kingdom of priests and a holy nation.

Their inheritance was never automatic. In Leviticus 20:22, God warns,

You shall therefore keep all my statutes and all my rules and do them, that the land where I am bringing you to live may not vomit you out.

The prophets repeatedly echoed this truth. If Israel ceased to be faithful to God’s covenant, they would be expelled (cf. Amos 7:7; Hosea 9:2-3; Jeremiah 3:19-20). Perhaps the most sobering warning comes in Jeremiah 17:3-4:

Your wealth and all your treasures I will give for spoil as the price of your high places for sin throughout all your territory. You shall loosen your hand from your heritage that I give you, and I will make you serve your enemies in a land that you do not know, for in my anger a fire is kindled that shall burn forever.

To live in the land was to fully embrace loyalty to God’s covenant. Security in the land was never about national strength – it was about faithfulness to the LORD.

The land was a gift, but a conditional one. It was never given to Israel as a piece of real estate to own apart from submission to God’s rule. It was Holy Land because it was God’s land – and He alone determined who could dwell there.

With this, we’ve now explored what it means for something to be holy (Part 1), the true identity of Israel as God’s covenant people (Part 2), and why the promised land was holy (Part 3). This groundwork prepares us to examine how the land promise finds its fulfillment in light of the gospel.

But before we do, we must address a common concern: the charge of “replacement theology” – the claim that the church has replaced Israel in a way that nullifies God’s promises to Israel. To be clear, I do not believe in replacement theology, as it lacks critically important nuance regarding the significance of Israel in the Bible. In the next part of this study, we’ll take that objection seriously with careful biblical reflection.