Better Bible Study Tip #76: A Text Cannot Mean What It Never Meant

On By Tyler BoydIn Better Bible Study

It is very important not to read into a text things that were not intended by the original author. Let the text speak for itself rather than reading into the text things that aren’t there.

Keep in mind that the question of what a text means is fixed by the the author, and is not open to reinterpretation. The goal of the Bible student should be to determine the author’s intended meaning. A text cannot mean what the text never meant in the first place. Meaning is determined by the author, and discovered by the reader.

A common practice in Bible classes and small group studies is to go around the room after reading a passage of Scripture and asking, “What does this verse mean to you, Susan?”

Susan says, “You know, to me this verse really seems to be saying _____”

And the leader will say, “Oh, that’s interesting. I’ve never thought of that before. What does this verse mean to you, Larry?”

“To me this verse means something entirely different. It makes me think about _______”. And Larry goes on to give an entirely different interpretation.

To treat the interpretation of scripture as subjective by asking “What does this mean to you?” is completely wrongheaded. The question we need to be asking is “What does this verse mean?” Period. Or to be more precise, “What did this verse mean to the author?”

Someone may object, “But isn’t it possible for a text to have more than one meaning, beyond the original, intended meaning, such as in Old Testament prophesies that were never truly understood until the time of the New Testament?”

I’m not ready to shut the door completely on this line of reasoning as a logical possibility. After all, 2 Peter 1:20-21 seems to suggest that if Scripture is inspired by God, there may very well be times where God’s intended meaning transcends the human understanding of the prophet himself.

But (and this is very important) this is no reason to begin ripping Scriptures from their original contexts. Even though God might communicate through human language in terms that humans failed to understand, he still communicated through human language. The more I study Old Testament prophesies in their original context, the more I find myself discovering that the New Testament author’s didn’t rip those scriptures out of context and assign new meanings, but rather they began to connect the dots to recognize contextual truths that were there all along. Although I have more studying to do, I suspect that no prophecy ever had a new meaning assigned to it, but rather a newly recognized meaning that was there in the original context, yet often overlooked until the time of Christ.

The real issue with assigning a new non-contextual meaning to Scripture is a simple one: Who among us can speak for God? For this reason, we should be properly concerned anytime anyone says that God has revealed to them a deeper meaning to a text that goes beyond it’s original meaning. If God wanted to inspire a New Testament author to recognize a deeper meaning to a Scripture, fine, I can go with that, since God himself was the Divine author of the Scripture in the first place. But since none of us speak for God, we do not have the right to assign new meanings to Scripture. Scripture cannot mean what it never meant in the first place.

Better Bible Study Tip #75: Never Stop Thinking Exegetically

On By Tyler BoydIn Better Bible Study

Exegesis is the process of drawing out the meaning from a text in accordance with the context. The goal of exegesis is to uncover the original meaning intended by the author.

Eisegesis, on the other hand, is the process of interpreting a text by reading ones own ideas or biases into it. This subjective approach is used to make a text conform to the interpreter’s own ideas or agenda, often disregarding the original context and meaning.

It should go without saying that exegesis should always be the goal of those who love God’s inspired words. Exegesis doesn’t require expert training, but it does require humility and effort. It is true that eisegesis can be easier, but that does not make it better. Reading one’s own desires, ideas, or hopes into a text can be tempting, especially if we approach the Bible with a strong preexisting ideological commitment. Sometimes it’s the urge to make a quick modern application, or to prove a quick point tempts us to use scriptures out of context.

Even so, good Bible students should always strive to think exegetically. ALWAYS. Exegesis is not a study method we should use only when it’s convenient. We must think exegetically all the time.

The problem with selective exegesis is that it opens to door for us to read our own, sometimes completely foreign, ideas into a text, thus making God’s word something different from what God actually said.

For example, it is not uncommon to hear Matthew 18:20, “For where two or three are gathered in my name, there I am among them,” used to prove that wherever two or three believers are gathered for worship, prayer, or fellowship, that Jesus’s presence is assured among them. This in turn is used to suggest that small gatherings of only two or three Christians can have the same significance of assembling with the larger church.

However, if we would learn to think exegetically all the time, we could easily learn that Jesus never used this teaching in this way. This is Jesus’s final phrase in much longer teaching about reconciliation between brothers. In Matthew 18:15-20, Jesus outlines steps for addressing a brother who sins, culminating in bringing the matter before the church if the individual does not repent. Verses 18-19 discuss the authority of binding and loosing given to the church. The promise in verse 20 (“where two or three gather in my name”) is specifically tied to the authority of gathered believers to make binding decisions in matters of discipline.

To make this text mean something God did not intend is to abuse the text, not use it. To avoid making such mistakes, one needs to learn to think exegetically, and to do so with every text.

Better Bible Study Tip #74: Ask “What’s the Point?” Over and Over Again

On By Tyler BoydIn Better Bible Study

One of the most important skills in doing Bible study is learning to trace the author’s arguments. This is especially important in books that are written in a discourse style, such as the New Testament epistles, or Ecclesiastes, but it is also a helpful tip for other books, such as the gospels, the prophets, Revelation, etc.

A good place to start is by reading through an entire book in one sitting (with most books of the Bible this can be done in well under an hour). When you finish reading the book, ask “What’s the author’s point, the overall point, of the whole book?” Try to write out a succinct one or two sentence answer.

After asking this question, try to trace the author’s argument. What approach did the author use to arrive at this overall point? What are the natural divisions of the book, and how do they fit into the overall argument?

Once you’ve gained a general feel for the overall flow of the book, zoom in a little closer, and begin asking “What’s the point?” over and over again, paragraph by paragraph. What is the point of each paragraph, and how does it fit into the particular part of the book you are studying?

I can’t stress this enough. If you want to gain a good understanding of a particular passage, you must be able to summarize what the author says, why the author says it at that particular point, and how the passage contributes to the overall argument.

If you will develop this habit of thinking contextually all the time, you will notice a few important changes in how you study the Bible.

  1. You will begin to realize that the meaning of a passage is self-contained. That means you will almost never have to look up cross-references or parallel passages from other parts of the Bible. You will become less reliant on things like commentaries, ready references, or Google searches to understand what a passage means. Learning to let the text explain itself is not only good Bible study, but in some ways it is easier than flipping back and forth to a handful of other verses, and trying to figure out how they all relate to each other.
  2. Certain passages will begin to stand out to you as far more important than you ever realized before. When you start thinking contextually, you will learn that there is nothing in a paragraph that does not fit into the author’s overall point. Every line of Scripture is important.
  3. The Bible will begin to make a lot more sense. This is what doing good Bible study is all about. You may still come across difficult passages now and then. When you do, there’s nothing wrong with consulting a commentary or looking up cross-references to help you figure it out. But when you do, your careful examination of the surrounding context will prepare you to evaluate those outside resources much more responsibly.

It doesn’t require a Bible degree or specialized training to simply ask “What’s the point?” That’s something anybody can do. It may take practice and it may take a little extra time and effort to think through the text in that way. But you can do it, and the rewards are worth it.

Suffering that Leads to Hope

On By Tyler BoydIn Christian's Relationship to Government, Kingdom Life, The Authority of God, The Resurrection

The Book of Daniel draws an important connection between Israel’s suffering and their hope for a better future. Central to this theme is the vision described in Daniel 7, where the Son of Man is depicted as being trampled by earthly kingdoms – visualized as terrifying beasts – yet ultimately exalted to reign with divine authority. Later, in the gospels, the phrase “Son of Man” became the most common way that Jesus referred to himself, indicating that Jesus viewed his mission as the fulfillment of the hope described in the book of Daniel. The purpose of this article is to explore how the book of Daniel provides an important perspective on faithful suffering and how this perspective is central to understanding the gospel.

Suffering in the Book of Daniel

Israel’s exile into Babylon serves as the backdrop to the events and prophetic visions described in the book of Daniel. The first part of the book (Daniel 1-6) describes the challenges faced by Daniel and his companions, Hananiah, Mishael, and Azariah.

The authorities assigned these men the task of learning Babylon’s customs and serving the very empire that had torn them away from their home. They could have abandoned hope in God and chosen instead to assimilate into Babylonian culture. Instead, then continually set themselves apart from the world around them by remaining loyal to God (cf. Daniel 1:8-9; 5:17). When the king demanded that Daniel’s friends bow to a large Babylonian image, they humbly and firmly refused, despite the looming threat of the fiery furnace (cf. Daniel 3:16-18). Later, when prayer to the LORD was declared to be a crime punishable by death in the lion’s den, Daniel still refused to hide or to stop offering his daily prayers (Daniel 6:4-11).

While living in Babylon, Daniel and his faithful friends refused to compromise their faithful loyalty to the LORD. Ironically, their willingness to remain faithful, even in the face of real danger and pain, continually resulted in their exaltation. Time and time again, they were honored and rewarded by the very kings whom they refused to serve (Daniel 1:19-20; 3:28-30; 6:25-27). Together, these famous accounts from the book of Daniel highlight the theme of faithful endurance, even while facing threats of suffering and violence. Rather than viewing suffering as a misfortune, the book of Daniel presents faithful suffering as the path to a better future.

The Vision of the Beasts (Daniel 7)

The stories of Daniel and his friends serve to explain, and are themselves explained by, Daniel’s wild vision described in chapter 7. The vision begins as Daniel sees four terrifying monster-like animals rise from the sea (Daniel 7:1-8). The fourth beast is described as the most terrible of all:

After this I saw in the night visions, and behold, a fourth beast, terrifying and dreadful and exceedingly strong. It had great iron teeth; it devoured and broke in pieces and stamped what was left with its feet. It was different from all the beasts that were before it, and it had ten horns.

Daniel 7:7

Daniel then looks and sees thrones where the “Ancient of Days” takes his seat, and the heavenly court sits in judgment over the beasts. The terrible fourth beast is destroyed and burned, and the dominions of the other beasts are taken away.

Once the beasts are judged, Daniel sees another figure, this time a human character, identified as the “son of man”:

I saw in the night visions,
and behold, with the clouds of heaven
there came one like a son of man,
and he came to the Ancient of Days
and was presented before him.
And to him was given dominion
and glory and a kingdom,
that all peoples, nations, and languages should serve him;
his dominion is an everlasting dominion,
which shall not pass away,
and his kingdom one
that shall not be destroyed.

Daniel 7:13-14

As we would expect, Daniel is greatly disturbed by this wild vision (Daniel 7:15). Thankfully, one of the spiritual beings from God’s court approaches Daniel and offers him an interpretation of what he was shown.

The Suffering and Exaltation of the Son of Man

The four beasts are identified as symbolizing the evil and destructive nature of four successive earthly kingdoms (Daniel 7:16-17). The terrifying fourth beast is depicted as kingdom that made war with, and prevailed over, the saints until the Ancient of Days pronounced judgment (Daniel 7:19-26).

The saints, however, would not remain defeated forever. The human figure, the exalted son of man, is identified as symbolizing the saints of the Most High, as they are given an everlasting kingdom.

But the saints of the Most High shall receive the kingdom and possess the kingdom forever, forever and ever.

Daniel 7:18

And the kingdom and the dominion
and the greatness of the kingdoms under the whole heaven
shall be given to the people of the saints of the Most High;
his kingdom shall be an everlasting kingdom,
and all dominions shall serve and obey him.

Daniel 7:27

Just as Daniel and his faithful companions faced continual threats at the hands of the Babylonians, so also the kingdom of the fourth beast continually trampled and defeated the saints of the Most High. And just as Daniel and his friends were continually exalted to positions of increasing authority as a result of the faithful endurance, so the saints were ultimately rewarded with an everlasting kingdom that would never pass away.

As we reflect on this wild vision given to Daniel, we begin to see the significance of the times when Jesus identified himself as the “Son of Man.”

Hope through Suffering in Christ

And he began to teach them that the Son of Man must suffer many things and be rejected by the elders and the chief priests and the scribes and be killed, and after three days rise again.

Mark 8:31

Then Jesus told his disciples, “If anyone would come after me, let him deny himself and take up his cross and follow me. For whoever would save his life will lose it, but whoever loses his life for my sake will find it. For what will is profit a man if he gains the whole world and forfeits his soul? Or what shall a man give in return for his soul? For the Son of Man is going to come with his angels in the glory of his Father and then he will repay each person according to what he has done. Truly, I say to you, there are some standing here who will not taste death until they see the Son of Man coming in his kingdom.

Matthew 16:24-28

When Jesus used the phrase “Son of Man,” he was recalling both the suffering, defeat, and ultimate exaltation of the saints in Daniel’s vision, and claiming this pattern to explain his purpose.

In Christ, we see that suffering and death are not ends in themselves. They are not mere unfortunate realities to endure. As the book of Daniel demonstrates, faithful endurance of suffering is the pathway to future exaltation. It is not a misfortune to avoid, but a doorway to vindication in an everlasting kingdom. This perspective transforms how we view our own trials and suffering at the hands of earthly rulers and kingdoms in our own day. By embracing faithful, submissive endurance, as Jesus did on the cross, we follow him on the path to eternal hope and glory.

Following Christ means accepting self-sacrificial suffering as an necessary part of our journey. Just as Daniel’s visions foreshadowed, and Jesus’s life confirmed, it is through enduring suffering faithfully that we find our ultimate exaltation. This truth calls us to a life-changing understanding of what it means to follow Christ: that true discipleship is marked by a willingness to embrace the cross, knowing that through it lies the promise of resurrection to eternal life and citizenship in an eternal kingdom.

How Earthly Kingdoms Stand Against Christ

On By Tyler BoydIn Christian's Relationship to Government, Kingdom Life

Throughout Scripture, earthly kingdoms, such as Egypt, Canaan, Assyria, Babylon, and Rome, consistently oppose God’s kingdom. From Nimrod’s Babel to the “Babylon” in Revelation, this continual theme deserves consideration. What about today? How should Christians view and relate to the earthly nation in which they live?

What is an “Earthly Kingdom”?

The word “kingdom” is now seldom used to refer to modern political dominions, with terms such as “nations,” “countries,” or “states” being more common. Here, I use the phrase “earthly kingdom” to distinguish these political dominions from the heavenly kingdom over which Christ reigns as King.

Christians should take no issue with the idea of a “king,” or “kingdom” in general. Calling Jesus “Christ” means acknowledging Him as God’s anointed King, the world’s true Lord. Christians are not anarchist. In a sense, Christians are monarchist, submitting to Christ’s rightful reign and seeking first His kingdom.

While the preceding article “What Jesus Talked About the Most” focuses on Christ’s Kingdom, this article examines the other earthly dominions which are governed by earthly rulers. How should Christians, citizens of the heavenly Kingdom, think about and relate to earthly nations and their rulers?

Who Do Earthly Kingdoms Serve?

When Jesus spent forty days in the wilderness, the devil tempted him:

And the devil took him up and showed him all the kingdoms of the world in a moment of time, said to him, “To you I will give all this authority and their glory, for it has been delivered to me, and I give it to whom I will. If you, then, will worship me, it will all be yours.”

Luke 4:5-7

The devil claimed that he had authority over all the kingdoms of the world, and the ability to give those them to whom he wanted. Interestingly, Jesus never disputed this claim. Notice Jesus’s response:

You shall worship the Lord your God, and him only shall you serve.

Luke 4:8

That’s it. Jesus did not dispute the devil’s ability to make good on his offer. If Jesus did not recognize Satan’s capacity to do so, the offer would not have been a genuine temptation as the text portrays it to be.

In fact, everything else the New Testament says about Satan’s authority over earthly kingdoms supports the Devil’s claim. Satan is elsewhere described as “the ruler of this world” (John 12:31; 14:30; 16:11), “the god of this world” (2 Cor. 4:4), and the “prince of the power of the air” (Eph. 2:2). John states that “the whole world is under the power of the evil one” (1 John 5:9).

In Revelation, the “beast” worships the Dragon, from which the beast had received it’s authority (Rev. 13:4). The Dragon is identified as the Devil and Satan (Rev. 12:9). This “beast” is an image of earthly kingdoms from the book of Daniel and is identified with “Babylon,” or more precisely, those who in John’s day were exercising Babylonian type authority (Rev. 17:1-9). This “Babylon” is described as a “dwelling place for demons” (18:2), and Christians are warned to “come out of her” (18:4). “Babylon” and the other earthly kings and nations under her deception are ultimately judged and destroyed (Rev. 18:9, 23).

One of the primary ways Satan influences the world is through giving authority to earthly kingdoms, which are described as worshiping him, and are under his dominion.

How Do Earthly Kingdoms Maintain Power?

Earthly governments maintain power through top-down authority, coercing behavior through the threat of violence. As Paul noted, they “do not bear the sword in vain,” ruling through violence or its threat to punish those who would oppose them. Civil laws carry weight because disobedience is punished with fines, imprisonment, pain, or death. Without the threat of punishment, civil laws are powerless.

Jesus frequently contrasted His kingdom with the ways of earthly ones. While earthly kingdoms are described as persecutors, Jesus’s kingdom belongs to the poor in spirit, meek, merciful, and peacemakers.

Blessed are those who are persecuted for righteousness sake, for theirs is the kingdom of heaven.

Matthew 5:10

While earthly rulers “lord it over” and “exercise authority” over others, the greatest in Jesus’s kingdom is a servant.

You know that those who are considered rulers of the Gentiles lord it over them, and their great ones exercise authority over them. But is shall not be so among you. But whoever would be great among you must be your servant.

Mark 10:42-43a

While subjects of earthly kingdoms fight for the success of those kingdoms, Jesus’s Kingdom is seen as “not of this world” due to their refusal to fight.

If my kingdom were of this world, my servants would have been fighting, that I might not be delivered to the Jews. But my kingdom is not of this world.

John 18:36

Earthly kingdoms are by their very nature violent, relying on the power of the sword to gain and maintain the power to lord over others. Without the power of death, earthly rulers would be unable to enforce even the most basic laws.

How Do Earthly Kingdoms Oppose God?

When people assert the right to rule over mankind, they claim authority which God has reserved for His Son. As Isaiah prophesied, the government rests on His shoulders, with an authority and dominion that is without end.

For to us a child is born,
to us a son is given
and the government shall be upon his shoulder…
Of the increase of his government and of peace
there will be no end.

Isaiah 9:6-7a

Jesus confirms this authority, stating, “All authority in heaven and on earth has been given to me” (Mt. 28:18). Earthly kingdoms exist because they do not recognize this authority. Instead of submitting to God’s rightful authority, they exalt themselves. Babylon’s attitude of self-exaltation is described by Isaiah as a rivalry the rightful authority of the Most High.

You said in your heart,
“I will ascend to heaven;
above the stars of God
I will set my throne on high;
I will sit on the mount of assembly
in the far reaches of the north;
I will ascend above the height of the clouds;
I will make myself like the Most High.

Isaiah 14:13-14

When Israel asked for a king like the nations, this too was recognized as a rejection of God’s reign (1 Sam. 8:7). Jeremiah likewise warned them against learning the “ways of the nations” (Jer. 10:2) reminding them that there is no king like the LORD.

 Who would not fear you, O King of the nations?
For this is your due;
for among all the wise ones of the nations and in all their kingdoms
there is none like you.

Jeremiah 10:7

As plainly stated in Psalm 2, God recognizes earthly kings as standing against the LORD and against His anointed King.

Why do the nations rage
and the peoples plot in vain?
The kings of the earth set themselves,
and the rulers take counsel together,
against the LORD and against his Anointed, saying
“Let us burst their bonds apart
and cast away their cords from us.”

Psalm 2:1-3

Earthly kings who do not change their ways and submit to God’s Anointed will be destroyed (Ps. 2:10-12).

Why Are Earthly Kingdoms Important?

Although earthly kingdoms are described as serving Satan, ruling by the power of death, and standing in opposition to Christ, Christians must recognize that God still uses them to accomplish an important task.

While Christians are forbidden from avenging their enemies (Rom. 12:19-21), God does not permit evildoers to escape His vengeance, and He uses earthly authorities for this purpose, as ministers who execute His wrath on evildoers.

Let every person be subject to the governing authorities. For there is no authority except from God, and those that exist have been instituted by God. Therefore whoever resists the authorities resists what God has appointed, and those who resist will incur judgment. For rulers are not a terror to good conduct, but to bad… For he is the servant of God, an avenger who carries out God’s wrath on the wrongdoer.

Romans 13:1-5

There are numerous examples in the Bible of God using earthly governments as his servants for this purpose. When Israel asked for a king like all the nations, God punished them by giving them what they asked for, a government like that of earthly nations (1 Sam. 8:22). God used the office of an earthly king to execute his wrath, just as he says in Hosea,

I gave you a king in my anger,
and I took him away in my wrath.

Hosea 13:11

Assyria is also described an instrument in God’s hands to execute His wrath. Interestingly, Isaiah makes it clear that God was able to use them as His ministera, even though they had no intention to serve God willingly.

Ah, Assyria, the rod of my anger;
the staff in their hands is my fury!
Against a godless nation I send him,
and against the people of my wrath I command him,
to take spoil and seize plunder,
and to tread them down like the mire of the streets.
But he does not so intend,
and his heart does not so think;
but it is in his heart to destroy,
and to cut off nations not a few.

Isaiah 10:5-7

Likewise, Jeremiah 50-51 describes how God used Babylon to punish Israel for their wickedness. Even the pagan King Cyrus was called “My shepherd who shall perform all my pleasure” (Is. 44:28).

Despite the wickedness of earthly authorities, God still uses them to fulfill His will on the earth. As long as evildoers continue, earthly kingdoms will play an important role, and must be submitted to for this reason.

There Is Another Way

When Jesus established his Kingdom, He did not do so by the pursuit of earthly political authority, but by dying on a cross at the hands those authorities. His refusal to fight for power shows His kingdom was different in nature from the kingdoms of the world (John 18:36). Jesus is a real king (John 18:37), but His kingdom gains and maintains its power the same way Jesus did, through faithful obedience, love, service, and sacrifice, submitting even to rebellious earthly authorities.

Peter urged Christians to disciples submit to pagan Roman emperor, not because they agree with their claim of lordship, but “for the Lord’s sake.” (1 Pet. 2:13). They trust that God can use these authorities as His servants (1 Pet. 2:14). By following Christ’s example of submissive suffering (1 Pet. 3:13-17; 4:1), His disciples faithfully trust in God’s ability to restore, confirm, and strengthen them (1 Pet. 5:10).

We submit to them, because they we that to Christ belongs the true “dominion forever and ever. Amen.” (1 Pet. 5:11). Christians are called to submit to earthly authorities and their kingdoms, all while living as strangers and exiles whose citizenship is in Christ’s kingdom.

What Jesus Talked About the Most

On By Tyler BoydIn Christian's Relationship to Government, Kingdom Life, The Authority of God1 Comment

Many people assume the goal of Christianity is to go to heaven. However, throughout the New Testament, not a single sermon concludes with “if you follow these steps, you can go to heaven when you die.” Far more often we find sermons proclaiming Jesus’s status as the anointed King (Christ) and Ruler (Lord). For example, in Peter’s Pentecost sermon, he declared “God has made him both Lord and Christ, this Jesus whom you crucified” (Acts 2:36). Similarly, Peter preached to Cornelius’s household about “Jesus Christ,” who is “Lord of all” (Acts 10:36). Even in Roman custody, Paul tried to convince others about Jesus and the Kingdom of God (Acts 28:23). Jesus’s kingship and lordship are at the very heart of the gospel (Romans 1:1-4).

The New Testament mentions the “kingdom” over 150 times, more than twice the frequency of the word “church.” While it is certainly worthwhile to study what the New Testament teaches about the church and heaven, it is unfortunate that the kingdom does not receive greater emphasis in modern Christianity. This was not the case with Jesus, who talked more about the kingdom than any other subject.

Jesus Preached the Kingdom

The gospel authors consistently emphasize the Kingdom as the main emphasis of Jesus’s teaching. For example, Mark 1:15 summarizes Jesus’s preaching throughout Galilee in one sentence: “The time is fulfilled, and the kingdom of God is at hand; repent and believe in the gospel.” Matthew 4:23 describes him as teaching in synagogues and “proclaiming the gospel of the kingdom.” Similarly, Matthew 9:35 and Luke 8:1 also highlight the kingdom as subject of Jesus’s message while healing diseases and afflictions. These passages all underscore the kingdom as the central focus of Jesus’s teachings.

When Jesus taught his disciples to pray, he taught them to pray about the kingdom (Mt. 6:9-13). Jesus instructed them to preach about the kingdom (Lk. 9:2; 10:9). His miracles, such as healing the sick and casting out demons, demonstrated that the kingdom was breaking into the world (Lk. 11:20). Jesus continually taught about how to enter the kingdom (Mt. 5:3; 6:33; Mk. 10:15; Lk. 13:3; 14:15-24; Jn. 3:3-5). Most of Jesus’s parables were used to explain the nature of his kingdom (Mt. 13:24, 31, 33, 34, 44, 45, 47; 18:23; 20:1, 22:2; 25:1; Mk. 4:26, 30, Lk. 13:18, 20).

Why did Jesus spend so much time talking about the kingdom? Because Jesus understood this to be the reason he was sent.

He said to them, “I must preach the good news of the kingdom of God to other towns as well; for I was sent for this purpose.”

Luke 4:43

What Is the Kingdom?

To put it simply, the Kingdom of God is the place where God reigns supreme and His will is done (Mt. 6:9-10). It is the “dome” (or “dominion”) over which God reigns as King.

Everyone in the first century knew what a “kingdom” was, but today we tend to use words like “nations,” “countries,” or “states” to describe political dominions. While modern rulers don’t typically use the title “King,” democratically elected rulers continue to hold similar authority to govern their respective states. Despite differences in how today’s rulers ascend to power, the concept of kingdoms and dominions with authoritative rulers persists in today’s world.

God also has a “kingdom” where choices are made in harmony with His will. Jesus, who is sinless, loving, and obedient, is the perfect example of what it looks like for God to reign over a person’s life completely. To enter his kingdom, one must be born again of water and Spirit, surrendering their life to continual imitation of Christ (John 3:3, Rom. 6:1-14; Phil. 2:5-8).

In the Sermon on the Mount, Jesus taught his disciples to pray, “Your kingdom come, Your will be done” (Mt. 6:10). God’s kingdom is where God’s will is done.

When is the Kingdom?

The Kingdom of God was not preached as a distant future event but as something imminent. John the Baptist and Jesus each preached that the Kingdom was “at hand” (Mt. 3:1-2; Mk. 1:15).

Similarly, in Luke 11:20, Jesus said,

But if it is by the finger of God that I cast out demons, then the kingdom of God has come upon you.

Jesus even told his disciples that some of them would witness the coming of the kingdom in their lifetime.

Truly, I say to you, there are some standing here who will not taste death until they see the Son of Man coming in his kingdom.

Matthew 16:28

For this reason, it should be no surprise when Paul and John also speak as if Christians were already in God’s kingdom at the time of their writing (Col. 1:13; Rev. 1:9). While there is a sense in which we still wait for the ultimate appearing of his kingdom, when the kingdom is delivered to the Father, when death is no more and every tear is wiped away (1 Cor 15:24, 2 Tim. 4:1; Rev. 11:15; 21:3-4), the kingdom of God is not merely a future hope for eternal life. It is a real kingdom presently here on earth.

If God’s kingdom is here, where is it?

Where is the Kingdom?

When questioned by the Pharisees about the arrival of God’s kingdom, he answered them:

The kingdom of God is not coming in ways that can be observed, nor will they say, “Look, here it is!” or “There!” for behold, the kingdom of God is in the midst of you.

Luke 17:20-21

Unlike earthly kingdoms with defined borders, Jesus’s kingdom exists anywhere things are done God’s way. Most of the world, filled with filled with war, violence, coercion, poverty, child abuse, sex trafficking, theft, injustice, hatred, and more, stands in opposition to God’s kingdom. But there are places where God’s will is done on earth as it is in heaven.

Jesus clarified to Pilate that while his kingdom is not of earthly origin, and is not sustained by earthly means, it is nonetheless a real kingdom, where Jesus reigns as a real King.

Jesus answered, “My kingdom is not of this world. If my kingdom were of this world, my servants would have been fighting, that I may not be delivered over to the Jews. But my kingdom is not of this world.”

Then Pilate said to him, “So you are a king?” Jesus answered, “You say that I am a king. For this purpose I was born and for this purpose I have come into the world – to bear witness to the truth – everyone who is of the truth listens to my voice.”

John 18:36-37

Jesus’s kingdom is as real as any other kingdom, and it is on earth now. If you want to know where God’s kingdom is, look to the places where people have reborn by both water and Spirit, and are heeding Jesus’s voice.

Who is the Kingdom?

Before identifying who is in the Kingdom of Christ today, it is helpful to differentiate this kingdom from the kingdom of God as it is otherwise described in the Bible. All that God did prior to the establishment of the Kingdom of Christ was done with that purpose in mind.

In the sense of rightful authority, all creation belongs to the Creator. But in the garden of Eden, something pivotal happened. Adam and Eve, rather than obeying the voice of their Creator, obeyed the voice of the Serpent. In so doing, they ceded authority to him who would eventually lead the whole world astray. In this sense, Satan too has a kingdom. But his kingdom only exists because he has usurped authority which did not at any point rightfully belong to him.

Since that time, two kingdoms have existed side by side, God’s and Satan’s, each bidding for mankind’s allegiance. After rescuing Abraham’s family from slavery in Egypt, God ruled over His kingdom of Israel through the law of Moses. Even as God anticipated a king (Deut. 17:14-20), He warned against the attitudes and actions which would defy his ultimate authority. Unfortunately, Israel rejected God’s reign, choosing instead to imitate surrounding earthly kingdoms (1 Sam. 8), leading to Israel’s decay and punishment (Hosea 13:11).

It was during this period of decay when the prophets announced that God would establish a new eternal Kingdom, where God would reign through His anointed King (Is. 9:6-7). Daniel too spoke of a Kingdom that was coming that would cut in pieces and destroy other earthly kingdoms (Dan. 2:36-45; 7:13-14).

Jesus was and is the fulfillment of this hope for a Kingdom. Paul refers to those who “boast in the cross of the Lord Jesus Christ” as the new “Israel of God” (Gal. 6:14-16), and Peter refers to Christ’s church as “a holy nation” (1 Pet. 2:9). That’s because Jesus has made them to be, “A kingdom of priests for God” (Rev. 5:10).

What Kingdom Are You a Citizen Of?

Salvation is much more than simply going to heaven. It includes rescue from the political forces and evil structures of this world which have aligned themselves with Satan (Col. 1:13; 2:15; 1 Jn. 3:8). The fact that Jesus established a Kingdom means that people are now forced to choose which Kingdom they pledge their allegiance to. We may be “born” into an earthly nation, but we are “born again” into God’s Kingdom.

It is important to note that the Bible rejects the concept of a “dual citizenship,” emphasizing that Christians live as foreigners, strangers, or exiles in their earthly nations. Our citizenship is not on earth, but in heaven (Phil. 3:20). The faithful are those who acknowledge themselves as strangers and exiles on the earth (Heb. 11:13). Christians are exiles, and as such, they are to abstain from the passions of the flesh which characterize the world (1 Pet. 1:17; 2:11).

The Kingdom of God is here now. This truth lies at the very core of the gospel which Jesus proclaimed, and it should be central to our message as well.

The time is fulfilled, and the kingdom of God is at hand; repent and believe in the gospel.

Mark 1:15

Reflections on Church Security and Faithfulness

On By Tyler BoydIn Christian Non-Violence, Love for Enemies

In recent years, the presence of armed security teams in churches has become increasingly common, largely due to the unfortunate reality of violent attacks, including potential church shootings.  However, beyond the immediate safety concerns, there are important doctrinal implications to consider as well. Does Scripture permit Christian churches to have armed security to protect them against deadly threats? On the other hand, does Scripture permit us to do nothing to protect the flock?

The aim of this article is simply to encourage us to reflect, not only on safety, but on the teachings of Scripture, particularly regarding how we as Christians should think about and treat our enemies.

On Courage and Justice

I deeply respect the courage of those who serve on church security teams, who are willing to put themselves in harm’s way to protect their Christian family from potential threats. Their courage is worthy of honor. Moreover, I believe the Bible demonstrates that murderers are justly deserving of death (Gen. 9:6; Ex. 21:23-25; Lev. 24:19-20; Deut. 19:21).

However, we must remember that justice and courage are not the totality of what is necessary for an action to align with faithful discipleship. Consider when Peter attempted to defend Jesus with the sword during His arrest (Lk. 22:47-53; Jn. 18:10-11). Peter showed tremendous courage, facing a mob of soldiers to protect an innocent man from being unjustly executed. Yet, Jesus rebuked Peter, highlighting a crucial point: just because an action is both courageous and just does not mean it necessarily always aligns with Jesus’s demands for his followers. “Eye for an eye and tooth for a tooth” must not be our only consideration (Mt. 5:38-42).

As Christians, our primary call is to faithfully follow Jesus as Lord, obeying his commands (Mt. 28:19-20). Therefore, our decision making regarding armed security in churches should not focus solely on what is most effective in providing safety, or even on what can be considered a “just” use of violence, but on what best reflects our commitment of faithfully obey Jesus.

On Self Defense and Protecting the Church

Paul’s words on marital love in Ephesians 5:25-29 serve as a guide for how husbands should care for their wives, mirroring Christ’s love for the church. This love is shown by “nourishing” and “cherishing” her. Similarly, in 1 Timothy 5:8 husbands are commanded to provide for the physical needs of their own households. Acts 20:28 emphasized the responsibility of elders to watch over and protect the flock. These Scriptures, and others, illustrate the necessity of protecting loved ones under our care from both spiritual and physical dangers.

Numerous New Testament passages illustrate the principle of protecting loved ones from physical harm. Joseph and Mary fled to Egypt to protect Jesus from King Herod (Mt. 4:13-14). Jesus escaped harm when his life was threatened in Nazareth (Lk. 4:29-30) and hid himself from harm at the temple (Jn. 8:59). When Paul’s life was threatened at Damascus, the disciples defended his life by lowering him in a basket to escape danger (Acts 9:23-24). To protect the church and loved ones from physical threats is something we should strive to do.

While there are times when laying down one’s life for Christ may be necessary, the New Testament does not suggest passivity in the face of danger. It is, however, important to acknowledge that the imperative to protect loved ones does not justify using any means necessary for safety. For instance, just as the duty to provide for one’s household doesn’t justify stealing food to feed them, protecting the church doesn’t permit denying Jesus or violating his commands. If someone threatened violence unless we denied Jesus as Lord, we could not comply, even in the name of defending the church. We might consider other actions, but denying Jesus or breaking His commands in the name of protection is not permissible (cf. Rom. 12:17-21; 1 Pet. 3:9; Rom. 3:8).

Self-defense and protection of loved ones is a good and righteous pursuit, but faithfulness to Christ must always take precedence over physical safety (cf. Rev. 2:10; 12:11).

On Loving Enemies

Every Christian contemplating scenarios where they might be called on to kill someone, and every elder considering putting members of their flock in positions where they might be called on to use lethal force, must wrestle with the question of whether such actions faithfully align with the commands of Jesus and his apostles.

The New Testament offers clear and consistent guidance on how Christians should view and treat their enemies. We are commanded to love and pray for them (Mt. 5:44; Lk. 6:27-28, 35), imitating the Father’s mercy and impartial kindness, even to those who don’t deserve it (Mt. 5:44-46; Lk. 6:36). We must not prioritize our love for those reciprocate it, but extend love even to our enemies (Mt .5:46-47; Lk. 6:32-35).

Not only are we commanded to love them and turn the other cheek when struck (Mt. 5:39; Lk. 6:29), but we are specifically commanded to “do good” to them (Lk. 6:27, 31, 34-35), even in those times when we expect nothing good in return as a result (Lk. 6:35). Blessing, and not cursing should characterize our desires for them (Lk. 6:28; Rom. 12:14).  We are not to repay their evil with evil, but with good (Rom. 12:17; 1 Thess. 5:15), doing everything we possibly can to be at peace with them (Rom. 12:18), leaving vengeance to God (Rom. 12:19), providing for their physical needs (Rom. 12:20), overcoming their evil with good (Rom. 12:21).

Jesus demonstrated this by serving, healing, and praying for his enemies, even as they took his life (Jn. 13:1-5; Lk. 22:52; 23:34). Jesus suffered even when he had the power to crush his enemies, and this is the example we are called to follow (1 Pet. 2:21-24).

And here’s the real challenge: there’s never an exception clause. Nowhere does it say “Love your enemies, except for the really dangerous kind who threaten to kill innocent people,” or “Do good to them, unless common sense tells you their life needs to be ended.” It’s always just “love them,” period. “Do good to them,” period. “Bless them,” period.

It’s noteworthy that many early Christians who originally received these commands did in fact have to deal with the really dangerous, life-threatening kind of enemy – the kind of enemy that would drag off family members and crucify them, or feed them to the lions, or burn them alive. They understood Jesus’s teachings as requiring so much more than simply being nice to difficult people. While they took precautions, they were committed to following Jesus’s commands regarding their enemies, even at the cost of their lives.

Doesn’t the Bible Command us to Arm Ourselves?

Before his crucifixion, Jesus commanded his disciples to buy a sword (Lk. 22:36). This command was not, however, for self-defense as often assumed. Rather, it was given for the reason stated by Jesus, “For I tell you that this Scripture must be fulfilled in me: ‘And he was numbered with the transgressors’” (Lk. 22:37). Later that evening, when Peter used a sword for self-defense, he was rebuked (Lk. 22:50-51), further clarifying that Jesus’s directive was not an authorization for self-defense.

The New Testament does, however, contain several instances where Christians are encouraged to arm themselves, but not with physical weapons. Instead, we are called to arm ourselves with spiritual attributes and mindsets. In 1 Peter 4:1, Christians are told to “arm yourselves with the same way of thinking” as Christ, who endured suffering for the sake of others (1 Peter 2:21-23).  Ephesians 6:13-18 instructs Christians to put on the “whole armor of God,” which includes truth, righteousness, peace, faith, salvation, and the sword of the spirit. Similarly, 2 Corinthians 10:4 emphasizes arming ourselves with spiritual weapons rather than relying on fleshly means. Thus, while Christians are indeed commanded to arm themselves against evil, the weapons we are called to use are always spiritual in nature.

Should Churches Have Armed Security Teams?

The primary consideration for churches regarding armed security teams is whether our actions align with the teachings and example of Christ and his apostles. We may certainly wrestle with the teachings of Jesus and his apostles, carefully considering if we are understanding his teachings correctly, and examining how they should best be applied in various situations, but we cannot choose to ignore or disagree with difficult commandments. Only if, after humble examination, we conclude that using lethal force against our enemies is consistent with Jesus’s commands, may we carefully proceed with armed security teams.

Remember, it is not enough to ask if the enemy deserves to be killed, or if our actions will effectively save lives. We must also consider if our actions align with the teachings and example of Christ, who died for us while we were still his enemies (Rom. 5:6-10).

If we conclude that using lethal force against an enemy is inconsistent with Jesus’s commands, this does not mean that we should be careless in protecting our families and churches. Shortly after the close of the New Testament period, the early Christians even gathered in catacombs due to safety concerns.

While I don’t understand how the decision to have armed security teams can be reconciled with the teachings of Scripture, I do not question the faith of those in support of armed security teams. After all, Jesus praised the faith of a Roman Centurion (Mt. 8:5-10). Although Jesus never endorsed the Centurion’s use of violence, he still recognized his faith as praiseworthy. I simply want to encourage all my fellow Christians to prioritize faithfulness to Jesus’s teachings about loving our enemies, even if it means risking our lives for His sake.



A Crucial Skill for Reading the Bible Well

On By Tyler BoydIn Better Bible Study

One of the most important skills for learning to read the Bible well is learning how the inspired authors designed their books communicate their main ideas clearly. Think about a photo mosaic: when you zoom in, you see lots of little pictures, each with its own details. But it’s only when you step back that you can see how all the little pictures fit together to make one big picture.

Similarly, while it’s good to focus on small sections of verses or one particular Bible story, it’s also important to step back and consider how entire books are structured to fit together to understand the main ideas of the inspired authors.

For example, the book of Genesis contains numerous stories that many Bible students are familiar with. But when  you notice how these stories are intentionally woven together, you start to pick up on some important key ideas.

The Problem

Consider the first few stories in Genesis. First, we read the account of creation (Gen. 1), where God created the heavens and the earth and repeatedly said that it was “good”. Then, we read about the first couple, Adam and Eve, who, rather than trusting that God knows what is good for them, eat of the tree of the knowledge of good and evil (Gen. 2-3). This failed test leads to a series of stories describing other times when Adam and Eve’s descendants failed the test: Cain and Able (Gen. 4:1-16), Lamech (Gen. 4:19-24), and the flood (Gen. 6:1-8). Noah, with his righteous obedience shines as a bright spot (Gen. 6:9-9:17), until he too falls into sin (Gen. 9:20-27). These stories of rebellion culminate in the building of Babel, which functions as the origin story of the Gentile nations that fill the world (Gen. 10-11).

In the aftermath of Babel, we are introduced to Abraham and his family. Although Abraham gives us an incredible example of faith in many instances (e.g., Gen. 15, 22), he also struggled at times to trust in God’s promises (Gen. 16), and was described as somewhat of a coward (Gen. 12, 20). His son Isaac acted in much the same way (Gen. 26). His grandsons, Jacob and Esau were not the kind of examples you would want to follow. Esau lacked self-control, and Jacob was a deceptive schemer (Gen. 25-31). The story of this dysfunctional, sin-filled family comes to a climax in the stories about Jacob’s sons, who sold their own brother into slavery (Gen. 37).

The same basic problem of sin (Gen. 2-3) which characterized all the nations of the world (Gen. 4-11) also characterized Abraham’s family (Gen. 12-50).

God’s Providence

The last section of the book of Genesis focuses on one of Abraham’s great-grandsons, Joseph. Joseph’s life was continually characterized by a series of providential reversals. Joseph went from being sold as a slave to being exalted as the overseer of Potiphar’s house (Gen. 39:1-4). He went from being a prisoner to being the second in command over all Egypt (Gen. 39:20; 41:41-44). He went from being hated and betrayed by his own brothers, to being the savior who delivered his family from starvation (Gen. 37:4; 42:6).

When we arrive at end of Genesis, the book closes with Joseph speaking to his brothers:

As for you, you meant evil against me, but God meant it for good, to bring it about that many people should be kept alive, as they are today.

Genesis 50:20

No matter what evil his brothers intended to do to him, God was still faithful to Joseph. Despite the family’s many flaws, God responded with good, weaving together the events of Joseph’s life in such a magnificent way as to save and bless this messed-up family. Joseph was speaking to his brothers, but by inspiring Moses to place this statement at the very end of the book, God shows us that he wants us to think about his providential faithfulness in all the events that led up to this point.

The Result of Reading the Bible Well

When we read the book of Genesis not as a mere collection of random stories, but as an entire inspired work, we begin to see certain patterns arise.

On one hand, we see a pattern of sin and failure. We see the serpent from Genesis 3 at work. We continually see the deceptive nature of sin. We see the mess that continually results when people seek to define good and evil on their own terms instead of trusting in God’s definition of good and evil. We see what happens when sin is crouching at the door, and man does not rule over it.

On the other hand, we can see positive patterns of faithful obedience. Against a dark background of a world filled with evil, faithful examples of men such as Enoch, Noah, Abraham, and Joseph shine even brighter. People find their greatest successes in those times when they faithfully trust and obey God.

Finally, we see patterns of God’s faithfulness. On multiple occasions throughout the book of Genesis, God makes promises to his people. He promises that Eve will find salvation through her seed who will crush the snake (Gen. 3:15). He promises to bless all nations through Abraham’s family (Gen. 12:1-4). He repeats these covenant promises to Isaac (Gen. 26:1-5) and Jacob (Gen. 28:13-15). We see God’s faithfulness at work, even in the darkest moments of human failure. We see that God can use human evil, which He has not caused, to accomplish His purposes.

When God inspired men to write the Bible, He didn’t only inspire individual verses or even individual stories. He inspired entire books, which were thoughtfully crafted together and intended to be read and meditated on as inspired wholes. One way to pay attention to the key messages of entire books is to pay attention to the way certain themes are repeated throughout the book. Learning to pay attention to repeated themes is one of the most important Bible study skills you can develop. As you develop an eye for picking up on these patterns, your ability to understand the key ideas from the individual stories will improve.

But the point of learning to read the Bible well is not simply to make you a more intellectual Bible student. When you see these patterns at work in the lives of these various Bible characters, you will begin to see how the patterns are at work today, even in your own life. You can begin to see your temptations, failures, and sin in a new way. You can be encouraged to trust and obey God, even in the most difficult of circumstances. And you can begin to look at all the problems and pains in the world and contemplate how God’s faithfulness is continually at work.

As you pay attention to divinely inspired patterns, these themes will begin to sink into your way of thinking about the world, and give you hope that despite the failures and sins of yourself and others, evil will not get the last word, which in turn should encourage you to faithfully trust in God’s directions for your life.

“The Church of God Among the Nations” by David Lipscomb

On By Tyler BoydIn Christian's Relationship to Government, Restoration

The Gospel Advocate; February 27, 1866

Has the separation that was established and perpetuated by God through a period of four thousand years, between God’s institutions and subjects and the human institutions of earth and their subjects, been obliterated in the dispensation for which all dispensations were given—the dispensation or reign of the Lord Jesus Christ? It is a universally received idea, we believe, among the students of the Bible, that there is not a lesson taught in God’s dealings with his people under His fleshly dispensations, not a principle vindicated, that was not intended more, for effect upon the perfect, spiritual kingdom of the “fullness of the times” than for immediate effect upon the temporal kingdoms to which they were given. The prime object of all those lessons of separation was to have their permanent effect upon the eternal kingdom of Jesus Christ. Is God less jealous of the sanctity of his eternal kingdom, established and reigned over through his anointed Son, than he was for the mere preparatory ones established and ruled through his frail, weak, sinning, human subjects? Our work, certainly, is sufficient, after having shown this separation, unless authority can be produced for uniting that which God hath sundered. But we again call attention to the positive teachings of the Holy Spirit directly upon the relationship they sustain toward each other.

For the Lord hath a controversy with the nations, he will plead with all flesh; he will give them that are wicked to the sword, saith the Lord.

Jeremiah 25:31

In which the fact is presented of a “controversy between God and the nations.” This controversy is undoubtedly with reference to the question: Who shall govern the world? Who shall rule man? God or the governments of the world? The result of this controversy is, “he will give the wicked,” those who maintain the government of the nations instead of the government of God, “to the sword.”

We next call attention to the teachings of the Holy Spirit through Daniel to Nebuchadnezzar. In Nebuchadnezzar’s dream or vision, the workings of human governments, their history and destiny, and the connection of the Church of Christ with them is plainly foretold by God and revealed by Daniel. In the vision of the image of the man, with a golden head, a chest of silver, belly and thighs of brass, legs of iron and feet of iron and clay, is presented the four kingdoms of earth, that were to attain to universal sway, and rule the world. The head of gold typifies the kingdom of Babylon, of which Nebuchadnezzar was the most powerful and illustrious ruler. It, with all its power, must be destroyed and its golden treasures and exalted honors become the prey of its despoilers. It is succeeded by the Medo-Persian empire, that rises on the ruins of its predecessor, attains universal sway, subjugates the world, and in turn, itself is broken and destroyed, to be succeeded by the third or brazen empire of Greece, whose mighty, conquering head, weeps that other worlds are not within the reach of its destroying and bloody sword. But with all of its mighty power it must soon be stripped of its powers and honors, a lifeless corpse, weltering in the blood of its own children. For the Roman empire strong as iron which “breaketh in pieces and consumeth all things,” commences its work of ruin and destruction. With it the vision of earthly, human empire closes. It indeed is broken in the pride of its strength and the glory of its power.

What human government, then, will be able to stand? No other human government can ever attain to universal dominion. All the governments of earth, to-day, are but the broken, discordant fragments of this once mighty empire. In their iron strength they linger out a lengthened existence even when dissevered, oftentimes exhibiting a mighty prowess that bespeaks them true to their origin, but by continual conflicts and ever worrying strife, are wearing themselves away, wasting their strength and making room for the kingdom which the “God of Heaven set up in the days of these kings.” Their mission, from the prophetic history, was to destroy one another, and under the rulings of God’s providence to give those who upheld them “to the sword.” Their destiny was to be destroyed. The end of the vision was:

A stone cut out of the mountain without hands, smote the image upon the feet, that were of iron and clay, and broke it to pieces. Then was the iron, the clay, the brass, the silver, and the gold broken to pieces together, and became like the chaff or the summer’s threshing floors; and the wind carried them away, that no place was found for them, and the stone that smote the image became a great mountain, and filled the whole earth.

Daniel 2:34-35

The interpretation of this was, that:

In the days of these kings [the Roman] shall the God of Heaven set up a kingdom, which shall never be destroyed, and the kingdom shall not be left to other people, but it shall break in pieces and consume all these kingdoms, and it shall stand forever.

Daniel 2:44

Here again the mission of these nations is distinctly set forth and their connection with the Church of Christ well defined. They were to be destroyed by the working of this kingdom, which the God of Heaven should set up, and the broken fragments as the chaff of the summer’s threshing floor to be blown away, so that no place for them should be found.

In contrast with the lesson that has been taught with reference to the destruction of the earthly kingdoms, the Kingdom of Heaven, “shall never be destroyed.” “‘The kingdom shall not be left to other people.” Another point of contrast. It has been taught that these earthly kingdoms, with all their riches and honors, should become the prey of their despoilers. Not a kingdom or government of earthly mold but in its overthrow or conquest, has been, with all its powers, possessions and honors, regarded and appropriated as the prey of the despoilers. But not so with the God-ordained kingdom. It was not to be left as a prey to other people, but with all its riches, honors, and priceless treasures, it is to be the perpetual heritage of its own meek and lowly children. No despoiler’s hand can deprive them or their rightful heritage in this kingdom, for God, its founder, is the guardian and protector of all its possessions. But the true omission of the Kingdom of God, with reference to the earthly kingdoms, is expressed in the next clause. “But it shall break in pieces and consume all these,” Its mission then, as distinctly set forth in this prophecy, is to break in pieces, consume and destroy all the kingdoms of earth. A spirit of perpetual antagonism is here developed, between God’s Kingdom and every form of human government. “God has a controversy with the nations.” An irrepressible conflict rages between the Government of God and all the human institutions of earth, which can only cease by the complete triumph of the one and the utter annihilation of the other. God will and can accept no doubtful fealty—no divided allegiance. He reserved to Himself the right to govern man. “To Him every knee shall bow and every tongue shall confess.”

The object of God then in establishing his Church or Government was to destroy all the governments and institutions of man, and through his Church, and only through it, rule and control the world. The church’s relationship to the world-powers and institutions of man must be in harmony with this—its chiefest mission. It cannot be one of alliance with and support to any of these institutions. It cannot, at one and the same time, both uphold and destroy an institution. Its first mission is to destroy all authority and power, and rule and bring the world in subjection to its great King. It is only to be remembered in this contest that the “weapons of its warfare are not carnal, but mighty, through God, to the pulling down of strongholds.” The little stone cut out of the mountain without hands was to fill the whole earth, so that no pace could be found for the image or any part of it. The Kingdom of Heaven will destroy all these earthly kingdoms and so engross the feelings, affections, time and labors of the denizens of earth, that no room or place will be found for the service of the earthly kingdoms. They are perishing. “It shall stand forever.”

The obligations and duties of the members of the Church of Christ, can in no manner conflict with this prime work and mission of the church itself. They cannot uphold what it must destroy. In doing this they war against the church, for it is through its members that the church accomplishes her work. If we thwart the workings of God’s church, we fight against God himself. But says one, “This antagonism was predicated only with reference to the kingdoms then in existence, not with reference to those which should afterwards arise.” The four kingdoms of Nebuchadnezzar’s vision are the only human kingdoms that have ever attained to universal sway. They are placed in contrast with the fifth universal kingdom—the Church of God. Evidently these strongest of all earthly kingdoms are made choice of as embracing and typifying all the institutions of human mold in their principles, workings and destiny. We doubt whether there has been brought into existence a single form or principle of government that did not find its first development and application in one of these four universal kingdoms. Indeed all the governments of earth are but the fragments and off-shoots or this last empire. What was true of the nature and destiny of this as a whole, is equally true of each of its different, dissevered parts. It is noteworthy that no two of these universal empires could exist at once in their fully developed power. As the one arose the other gradually decayed, wore away, disappeared and made room for its successor. Since the establishment of the Church of Christ, no human institution has ever made even a respectable effort to attain to universal dominion. The tendency has been to weaken the bonds that bind nations together, to disintegrate and separate. The attrition and friction of perpetual conflict and war will continue to weaken and wear out their strength and vigor, so that as the Church of Christ advances they will vanish away, and when it shall have accomplished its perfect work and attained to its full proportions, they will have been entirely destroyed. So that man owing allegiance only to God’s government, will render no divided service. His Kingdom will fill the whole earth. God will rule in and through it, and thus be all and in all.

But the prophecies of Daniel are even yet more replete with instruction upon these subjects. The dealings of these empires with Shadrach, Meshach and Abednego, and their deliverance from the furnace, the trials of Daniel, and the closing of the Lion’s mouth, the banishing of Nebuchadnezzar from the throne, his seven years of beastly life, and the final complete destruction at once of his kingdom and all were intended to teach one clear, specific truth, that all these human kingdoms were in their very nature opposed to the rule and dominion of God, but that their highest exaltation wrought their deepest humiliation, with all their might they must come to naught. The very divisions that were to take place in this mighty iron empire—the last and strongest of earth, under the types of the heads and horns, are pointed out, their nature and work designated and the destruction of each one plainly foretold. The disposition of those was, to “speak great words against the Most High; to wear out the Saints of the Most High; to think to change times and laws;” but the end, notwithstanding, for a time this power was to be granted to them, was to be “the judgment shall sit, and they shall take away his dominion to consume and to destroy it unto the end” or to a complete destruction.

And the kingdom and dominion and the greatness of the kingdom under the whole heavens shall be given to the people of the Saints of the Most High, whose kingdom is an everlasting kingdom and all dominions shall serve and obey him.

Daniel 7:27

“The Old Testament Kings and God’s Justice” by David Lipscomb

On By Tyler BoydIn Christian's Relationship to Government, Kingdom Life, Restoration

The Gospel Advocate; February 20, 1866

In our investigations we have found that God, at all times, kept a wide gulf of separation between his Jewish kingdom and subjects, and the world-institutions by which they were surrounded. No alliances—no af­filiations—no courtesies as equals with the man-governments or their subjects, were never engaged in without receiving a signal mark of God’s displeasure. May his subjects not have adopted some government of their own, and have harmonized it in spirit with his laws, and have thus received his approbation? In the beginning, as we have found, God gave the law, perfect and complete, in the most minute particulars. He left no room for human legislation—for the exercise of human discretion.

The law was, ye shall not do after all the things that we do here this day, every man whatsoever is right in his own eyes… Whatsoever things I command you, observe to do it; thou shalt not add thereto nor diminish from it.

Deuteronomy 12:8, 32

Yet we find in later ages a changed govern­ment, altered institutions among the Jews. How did these changes come about?

It came to pass when Samuel was old, he made his sons judges in Israel. His sons walked not in his ways, but turned aside after lucre, and took bribes and perverted judgment. Then all the elders of Israel gathered themselves together and came to Samuel unto Ramah, and said unto him, behold thou art old, and thy sons walk not in thy ways: now make us a king to judge us, like all the nations. But the thing displeased Samuel, when they said give us a king to judge us: and Samuel prayed unto the Lord. And the Lord said unto Samuel, “Hearken unto the voice of the people, in all that they say unto thee: for they have not rejected thee, but they have rejected me, that I should not reign over them.”

1 Samuel 8:1

He tells them the consequences of this course. But still ordains they shall have a government of their own to punish them for their folly in becoming dissatisfied with God’s government and desiring a human one. If the Jews would ever have been justified in interpolating human laws and human expedients into the Divine government, it certainly was when those institutions of God were perverted to base and unlawful pur­poses, and his officers failed to do their duties. We see that the desire of a man-government even then amounted to a rejection of God as their king and ruler.

The introduction of this human polity was the main cause of Israel’s many sins and rebellions in her history, of the long bloody family feuds between Israel and Judah, brought upon her, her sorrows and woes, her sad overthrow and long and cruel dispersions as fugitives and outcasts among the nations of the earth. This king, as their head, was the chief cause of turning them from the law of God. We find Saul, David, Solomon, Hezekiah all approved of God in their private walk, so elated with pride at their wonderful exaltation, that they violated God’s law themselves and led their subjects into sin.

If the best among these kings caused their subjects to sin, and weaned their affections from God, divided their allegiance, diverted their sense of responsibility from the law of God to the law of the king, what must have been the fatal effects of her more corrupt and wicked princes. We find them continually leading them away from God’s law into sin. At their return from captivity in Babylon, under Ezra and Nehemiah, it was said in Ezra 9:2, “The band of the princes and rulers have been chief in this trespass,” that had brought them into captivity. It was Hezekiah’s forgetfulness of God’s law in his anxiety to be courteous and friendly with the King of Babylon, that pro­duced the second captivity. Hosea speaking of this same rejection of God and choosing an earthly king, says:

O Israel, thou hast des­troyed thyself; but in me is thy help. I will be thy king: where is any other that may save thee in all the cities? and thy judges of whom thou saidst, Give me a king and princes. I gave thee a king in mine anger, and took him away in my wrath.

Hosea 13:9

Your dissatisfaction with my appointments as I gave them was your ruin. To punish you for this, I gave you a king who oppressed you, who involved you in difficulties, brought upon you war, trouble, famine, and slaughter, but when under this punishment, you failed to humble yourself and repent, but waxed worse and worse in your sin and rebellion, in my wrath I took from you your king and left you deso­late, without either a Divine or human head, a prey to all your enemies, to be scattered over the face of the earth, a by-word and a hissing among all the nations, as a perpetual warning to all families, kindred, tribes and tongues, of the folly and sin of becoming dissatisfied with Heaven’s appointments.

God, to some extent at least, recognizes this earthly king as a rival of himself, and indicates the impossibility of man’s having both, a Heavenly and an earthly king. He clearly indicates that the Jew could not have another king, and at the same time be regarded as the subjects of Heaven. We find that the Jew was prohibited of God from either mak­ing alliances with human governments formed by nations not of God’s people, or of adopting into the government he had made for them, institutions of their own devising. He was God, and He their only King, ruler, law-maker—they could have none other. To have another was to reject God.

What thing soever I command you, observe to do it. Thou shall not add thereto, nor diminish from it.

Deuteronomy 12:32

We thus find that God kept his subjects aloof from all connection with the world, or human governments. He considered his alliances with these institutions as adulteries in his espoused wife. In Ezekiel 23, under the type of the two sisters, Aholah and Aholibah, in their whoredoms, he represents Judah and Israel in their alliances with the world-governments. In their punishment by their lovers he typifies their punishment inflicted by those nations with whom they formed alliances.

But in process of time this nation of God is so corrupted by these earthly, human institutions and alliances, that God will no longer forbear with them. He abolishes this national institution, and in its place estab­lishes his universal and eternal spiritual kingdom. “What relationship does this new and eternal kingdom sustain to the world-institutions by which it is surrounded and with which it comes in contact?” is the ques­tion of prime importance in our investigation, and one which, in importance to the well being of the church is not transcended by any known to the Christian world. The Jewish dispensation was the type of the Chris­tian kingdom. The Christian kingdom or church superseded the Jewish and occupied the same position with reference both to God and the world that refused submission to Him, that the Jewish did.

Paul in his letter to his Roman brethren, says the Jews, through unbelief, were broken off, and the Gentiles, through faith, were grafted in. Without determining what is the special position from which the Jews was broken or cast, and into which the Gentile was grafted, it suffices our present purpose to note that just the position with reference to God and the world, from which the unbelieving Jew was broken, the believing Gentile was grafted in. The Jewish institution was the type of the spiritual, teaching through God’s dealings with it, how He would deal with the church, this could not be so unless they occupied the same relationship to God and the world. God’s dealing with the Jew in one relationship, could not teach us how he would deal with the Christian in a dissimilar one. The treatment of the out­ward nations by the Jews could be no lesson to us as to how we should act towards the unbelieving unless we occupied a like position with reference to them.

These things being so, and God having, through a period of four thousand years, kept a deep and wide gulf of separation between his people, his nation, his kingdom and the human kingdoms of earth with their subjects, having, under every possible form and on every occasion, besought and warned his children against such associations or affiliations; against alliances, individual or national; against relying upon the human institutions for aid or help in any of their difficulties, having shown that the help of the human institutions was weakness, confusion and ruin to them—in a word, God having separated them in every possible manner, and on every possible occasion, he did it all, not for them, but to teach us that Christians must be a separate and distinct people.

With all these teachings, through so long a period, so repeatedly, emphatically and distinctly set forth, it certainly is true, that without some positive net or declaration of God connecting or uniting them, the government of God with its subjects, must forever remain separated from the world-institu­tions with their subjects, with no alliance or affiliation, no participation of the one in the affairs of the other. Upon him that would connect them, the responsibility of showing when and how God united them, and what that union is, certainly devolves. We shall, in our next, examine the Scriptures to see if they have been so united.